Twilight Saga Wiki


aka ⭐🌙

1,886 Edits since joining this wiki
October 9, 2012
  • I live in
  • I was born on September 26
  • My occupation is ☾Empath ☼ ↟
  • I am Female
Revision as of 17:19, February 15, 2013 by MinorStoop (Talk | contribs)

| User:MrsLunchBox


When adding categories to pages, please take the time to follow the related tree you will generally find that they're on a higher up category. Yvette and Henri are not tagged as film-only characters because it's the French coven tagged as such. MinorStoop 18:46, December 11, 2012 (UTC)


When adding pictures to pages, I'd recommend working in source mode, rather than visual mode; it helps avoiding putting links within the text. Please, take also care to alternate pictures between left and right of the page - you just need to add the "|left" code somewhere in the link. MinorStoop 16:15, December 14, 2012 (UTC)


Please, do not add the "Relationship" redirect to pages - the page has a different purpose. MinorStoop 15:52, December 16, 2012 (UTC)

I must look into that.
Differently from pages such as Vampire or Shape-shifter which are an in-depth examination of the creatures, the relationship page is just a jumble list of all the relationships in the saga. The "Relationship" paragraph in the single character pages deals with other characters she/he interacts with. A link to those character pages, therefore, has a meaning, but not a link to "relationships". 16:15, December 16, 2012 (UTC)
Truth to tell, I'm not so sure whether I gave you the correct instructions - it's a tough question. I'm consulting TagAlongPam about it; let's leave pages as they are until she tells us her opinion. MinorStoop 16:15, December 16, 2012 (UTC)
Confirmed - the tempate goes, the page it points to not being a more in-depth analysis of the page's relationships, but just a list. MinorStoop 07:49, December 17, 2012 (UTC)

Re: Gallery: Amun and Kebi

That's no big deal - Amun and Kebi are actually very minor characters, so it is simply to be expected that they've got few pics. It's not worth the effort to delete the page. MinorStoop 15:57, December 17, 2012 (UTC)

Rachel Black image

That pic of Rachel Black has been downchecked a long time ago. Only thing that keeps it on-wiki is that it's used on a personal blog. MinorStoop 08:45, December 21, 2012 (UTC)


Your reverts indicate a good understanding of this wiki's structure - on occasion (such as Mr. ExecutionBallet's latest) you might want to add to them a warning to the perp. If you feel like, it's no imposition.

Should you be interested, you may apply to Pam for rollback rights - I'd be glad to sponsor you. MinorStoop 19:06, February 11, 2013 (UTC)

Re:Erica LaRose

Go right ahead. MinorStoop 19:00, February 14, 2013 (UTC)

On a second thought, it is probably not worth the bother - we've already had a fairly lengthy disagreement over a character like this, though somewhat flimsier. I mean, a stub for the actress is justified, a page for a non-speaking, uncredited part is not, unless the part plays a critical role. Which this is not. MinorStoop 19:09, February 14, 2013 (UTC)


Noticed you use this word "Uncredits", a few times, but have no idea what it means. Could you please let me know? Thanks! MinorStoop 17:19, February 15, 2013 (UTC)

Around Wikia's network

Random Wiki