Are we not suppose to Categorised All the Shape-shifters. I am adding 10 current and their 6 ancestors who are Shape-shifters, why are they being removed. All the Vampires are give Category:Vampire.

If you remove the Shape-shifters as they are listed in their repective packs then remove the vampires too. So why this partiality between Vampires & Shape-shifters. Ankit09 02:42, September 25, 2012 (UTC)

You are mistaken, many vampires are not given the Vampire category. The only ones that are are vampires whose covens do not exclusively contain vampires, such as the Cullen family. Renesmee is not a vampire and thus Category:Olympic Coven/Cullen family cannot be categorized under Category:Vampires and we have to individually list the Cullen family members that way. But for the vampire-only covens, like the Mexican coven, the whole coven can be put under Category:Vampires and so a character like Nettie does not need the Vampire category. In the case of the shape-shifters, both the Uley and Black packs only contain shape-shifters and so we can use Category:Shape-shifters on the pack categories instead of categorizing the character pages individually. -TagAlongPam (talk) 03:23, September 25, 2012 (UTC)
In Eclipse it is mentioned Taha Wi that took over leading the pack after Taha Aki, his father stopped phasing. So he should be considered an Alpha. So to add his name in Known Alphas & Category:Alphas. Ankit09 17:23, October 5, 2012 (UTC)

Ad blocker interference detected!

Wikia is a free-to-use site that makes money from advertising. We have a modified experience for viewers using ad blockers

Wikia is not accessible if you’ve made further modifications. Remove the custom ad blocker rule(s) and the page will load as expected.